Status of the research at UCLA on the parameterization of subgrid-scale orographic effects in large-scale models of the atmosphere


Young-Joon Kim
Department of Atmospheric Sciences
University of California, Los Angeles


Outline of the Research

    The main objective of the research has been to verify and improve parameterization of orographic gravity-wave drag that is needed in numerical models of the atmosphere. We earlier noted that parameterization schemes for orographic gravity-wave drag are evaluated mostly from the viewpoint of overall improvement of simulated fields (e.g., Palmer et al. 1986 ) in which errors from a variety of other sources may coexist and interact. In order to avoid this situation, we followed a direct way of assessing parameterization schemes of orographic gravity-wave drag by using a mesoscale gravity-wave model. We evaluated gravity-wave parameterization schemes by comparing the results to those simulated by a mesoscale model with high horizontal resolution ( Kim and Arakawa 1995 ). We constructed a revised scheme to improve the parameterization based on our findings from the experiments with the gravity-wave model.
    In most large-scale models of the atmosphere, the effects of subgrid-scale orography are represented by means of parameterizing subgrid-scale orographic gravity-wave drag and/or enhancing grid-scale orography, such as "envelope orography" ( Wallace et al. 1983 ), with the use of subgrid-scale orographic variance. We implemented the revised parameterization scheme and an envelope orography into the UCLA General Circulation Model (GCM) of the Atmosphere. Through preliminary experiments with the GCM, we found that the scheme greatly improved the northern hemisphere winter simulations especially when used in conjunction with an envelope orography ( Kim 1996 ). It is of further interest to see the impact of the gravity-wave drag and the envelope orography on the summer simulations of the northern hemisphere. Also of interest is the interannual variability of the impact as well as the impact with higher resolution versions of the model. Research along this line is now underway.

PHASE I: Numerical Simulation of Orographic Gravity Waves

    As the first phase of the research, we developed a gravity-wave model based on the 2-dimensional, anelastic, nonhydrostatic system of equations with second-order closure turbulence and a thin, but efficient sponge layer ( Kim 1992; Kim et al. 1993).
    In order to generate a database for assessing gravity-wave drag parameterization schemes, we performed a series of simulations of mountain waves with various shapes and sizes of orography ( Kim and Arakawa 1995 ). We successfully simulated various mountain waves, some of which were verified against some analytic solutions of the flow over idealized orography.

PHASE II: Development of a New Parameterization Scheme for Orographic Gravity Waves for use in a Large-Scale Model

    Observational studies show that gravity waves generated by orography break not only in the lower stratosphere but also in the lower troposphere. The potential importance of nonlinear drag enhancement due to low-level wave-breaking in parameterizing orographic gravity waves has been recognized by many modelers (e.g. Chouinard et al. 1986; Palmer et al. 1986; Pierrehumbert 1986; Peltier and Clark 1986; McFarlane et al. 1987; Bacmeister 1993 ), but it has not been explicitly incorporated in most existing parameterization schemes, except by, e.g., Miller et al. (1989) .
    As the second phase of our research, we first constructed a test parameterization scheme by making use of the essential features of the existing schemes. The reference-level drag is determined using the formulation by Pierrehumbert (1986) , while the vertical distribution of the reference-level drag is obtained following the algorithm by Miller and Palmer (1986) , which incorporates the ideas of wave-saturation and wave-dissipation by Lindzen (1981) and Eliassen and Palm (1960) , respectively.
    We then evaluated the test parameterization scheme with the aid of the dataset collected from the mountain-wave simulations obtained for a variety of orographic conditions from the gravity-wave model developed in Phase I. Through a series of experiments performed with the dataset, we found that the test scheme, which performs similar to Palmer et al's (1986) scheme, does not properly treat the enhancement of drag due to low-level wave-breaking. The experiments we performed indicate that the standard deviation of orography and the tuning coefficient for the parameterization alone are not sufficient for properly representing this effect of low-level wave-breaking ( Kim and Arakawa 1995 ).
    To overcome this deficiency, we devised more detailed statistical measures of subgrid-scale orography (i.e., higher moments than the standard deviation), such as the asymmetry and convexity (or sharpness) of orography, for use as additional input to the parameterization scheme, and revised the test scheme ( Kim and Arakawa 1995 ). We performed a series of experiments with the revised scheme using the dataset obtained from the mountain wave simulations. The results demonstrate that the revised scheme improves the results through the selective enhancement of the reference-level drag and the divergence of drag depending upon the orographic configuration and the corresponding flow condition.
    We performed an "off-line" test of the revised scheme by applying the scheme to global monthly mean data. We started the 4 deg. lat. x 5 deg. lon. 15-layer version of the UCLA GCM, excluding gravity wave parameterization, with 12Z 1 Oct. 1982 NCEP (NMC) analyses using 10-year climatological surface conditions, and integrated for 4 months. We diagnostically applied our revised scheme to January mean variables obtained from this simulation. The revised scheme generates substantial drag at low levels especially in the midlatitude northern hemisphere. Our results is similar to that of Miller et al. (1989) in that low-level drag divergence is significant (in global average) and is larger than upper-level drag. The difference is that our result is obtained through selective enhancement of drag when there is possibility of low-level wave-breaking as detected by the additional statistical measures of orography in the revised scheme ( Kim and Arakawa 1995 ). We argued that unlike most other schemes, our scheme distinguishes between the two contrasting flow situations in terms of "upstream" and "downstream" effects on the drag; i.e., decreasing the drag in the upstream region and enhancing the drag in the downstream region.

PHASE III: Implementation and Evaluation of the New Parameterization Scheme for Orographic Gravity Waves into a Large-Scale Model

     The third phase of the research was to implement and evaluate the revised scheme in the UCLA GCM. Since the scheme was developed under a 2-D framework based on our 2-D gravity-wave model, some additional considerations were made to implement into a 3-D large-scale model. For example, we calculated Orographic Asymmetry, which is one of the additional statistical measures of orography, for 8 predetermined wind directions, while we calculated Orographic Convexity for full 3-D orography in a grid box, both from the 10' Navy high-resolution orographic data. We first performed sensitivity experiments of the GCM simulation to the parameters of the scheme that are mainly associated with 3-dimensionality of the model which could not be determined with a 2-D gravity-wave model. We then cold-started the model from several dates in October, 1982, and ran using climatological model boundary conditions until January next year to obtain the mean of January, during which the atmospheric stability is largest and thus the effect of gravity-wave drag is largest in the northern hemisphere.
    We found from the ensembles of the simulations that the gravity-wave parameterization scheme and the envelope orography have a qualitatively similar and beneficial impact on ensemble means of simulated January climate ( Kim 1996 ). The mid-latitude westerlies were weakened at all levels and the polar atmosphere was warmed in the northern hemisphere. A combination of the two produced the best results. Sensitivity experiments with the parameterization scheme also indicated the importance of the selective enhancement of low-level drag which we argued in our earlier study ( Kim and Arakawa 1995). PHASE IV: Investigation of the Impact of Parameterized Gravity-Wave Drag and Envelope Orography on Climate Simulated by a Large-Scale Model
The fourth phase of the research is to further evaluate our parameterization scheme of orographic gravity waves with emphasis on its impact on the simulated climate. In our earlier study ( Kim 1996 ), we found that the magnitudes of gravity-wave drag are systematically different in January simulations using the two representations of orography in the mid-latitude northern hemisphere although the overall impact of gravity-wave drag on the mean fields is similar when using the standard version of orography or the envelope orography. The modification in the magnitudes of simulated meridional eddy momentum fluxes by gravity-wave drag with the standard orography is as in earlier studies. It is, however, not the case with the envelope orography. Whereas the impact of gravity-wave drag and the envelope orography on the mean fields is similar, it is not necessarily true in terms of the individual components of simulated angular momentum budget.
    In Kim (1996) , we were limited by the computational efficiency to obtaining the ensemble means of eight January simulations obtained from 4 month integrations (Oct. year 0 through Jan. year 1) which do not cover annual cycles. In order to obtain more robust results, long-term multi-year simulations are required. It also remains to be seen how the envelope orography and gravity-wave drag parameterization perform in northern hemisphere summer as some studies report degradation of summer simulations with envelope orography. To this end, we recently developed a version of the UCLA GCM code suitable for massively parallel processors ( Mechoso et al. 1993; Mechoso 1995; Wehner et al. 1995 ). It is of considerable interest to perform higher horizontal resolution (2 deg. lat. x 2.5 deg. lon.) experiments since the gravity-wave drag scheme was designed to parameterize the effects of subgrid-scale gravity waves in domains smaller than those corresponding to the current resolution of the model, not to mention that higher resolution better resolves the nature. These simulations are currently being performed ( Kim et al. 1999). Besides, we have also increased the vertical resolution (no. of layers) of the model from 15 to 29 and further to 58 in terms of the number of model layers.
     Furthermore, we are verifying the scheme with various other physics parameterization routines of the model. The atmospheric component of the UCLA coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model has recently been upgraded from the tropospheric to stratospheric version. Since the presence of the stratosphere introduces additional physical processes (e.g., ozone and photo chemistry) and since the stratosphere is where the gravity-wave drag is largest in magnitude, we need to study the response of the model to the introduction of gravity-wave drag with and without those physical processes. We have recently experienced interesting sensitivity of the simulation to some details of the radiation parameterization. For example, after we prescribed the ozone mixing ratio rather than let the model predict, we found that the upper part of the model atmosphere (model top is at 1 mb) became excessively warmer. Then, we improved the short-wave radiation scheme and obtained significantly cooled-down upper atmosphere, close to that with predicted ozone. We are currently working on the improvement of long-wave radiation parameterization as well. Since a modest change in radiation parameterization can significantly change the thermodynamics and/or dynamics of the model atmosphere and therefore change the structure and magnitude of the polar night jet in a way similar to gravity-wave drag, we need to systematically investigate the separate and combined impact of gravity-wave drag and radiation. A study along this line is reported in Kim et al. (1998).

References